Latest Perspective on Russia’s Gold Industry
Mr. Valeri N. Braiko is the
Chairman of the Union
of Gold Producers. The
Russian Union of
Gold Producers has approximately 50 members, including gold
mining companies, commercial
banks, processing and refinery
mills and other associated companies
in precious metals and
markets. The group was founded in
1995, and their major role is to lobby for the interests of the Russian gold
mining industry with the State Duma of the Federation
Council.
Mr. Braiko
commented that in the early 1990s, many foreign investors entered the gold
producing market, and many licenses were issued. These projects included Omolon, Burliatzoloto
and the Pakrovsky mine. The situation now has changed considerably,
according to Mr. Braiko. Government funding for
projects is close to zero. Gold loans on
earlier projects were not paid back for the most part. Funds were transferred from the federal
government to the regions. Many times
these funds were not spent for their intended purpose. The funds, he states, should have gone to the
producing companies, but they went to the local governments, and the companies
never saw them.
Here are
some quotes from Mr. Braiko:
“There are many negative results in
the foreign investment area. These
include Star Mining, who started Sukhoi Log in Irkutsk; Echo Bay, and Pan American Silver, in regards to Dukat. Because of
the failed foreign investment projects, many Russian gold producers have
the opinion that dealing with foreign investors will lead them nowhere. After
1998, after the default and the financial crisis, the gold mining industry
began to increase production. For the
last three years, the annual increase was 10 tonnes;
last year it was 20 tonnes. Many Russian companies began to invest in
gold, such as Sibneft and Polymetal,
who invested $160mn in Russian gold. Polymetal is a Russian company, who has acquired gold and
other metals companies, and it is also involved in construction, research and
technical companies. It is a big
financial holding out of St. Petersburg.”
“Norilsk Nickel also has a serious gold
program. For the last two years, they
have wanted to expand their gold holdings, in addition to nickel, copper and
other metals. They haven’t invested yet,
but they are evaluating various options.
Norilsk is considering acquiring Polyus, in Krasnoyarsk, which would add 25 tonnes
annually to their production.”
“Russian companies now have enough capital
to develop their own funding and Russian commercial banks can provide their own
financing. Foreign investors need to
know this and become competitive in this framework.”
“Because of the negative experiences Russians experienced in gold
projects, local governments believe it is unreasonable for foreign investors to
invest in gold projects, for example Sukhoi Log. Some have recommended that foreign investment
in gold not be allowed and to limit investment to Russian companies.”
“From my point of view, the right
conditions exist now in Russia to develop the gold mining industry. There are promising projects where foreign
investors could participate. For example, Darasun in the Chita Region and Kupol and Maiskoye in the Chukohta region.”
“As one example in Kamchatka, there is Aginskoye. This has been conceded by foreign investors,
it has changed hands three times but with no results. Now it belongs to a Russian company. It is a negative example. In Kamchatka, there are other foreign companies,
issuing and reissuing licenses and not much is happening.”
“It is the impression of many analysts on the Russian side that
foreign companies want to buy companies cheaply to increase their share price
on the stock market. They argue about
licenses and then sell holdings to another company for a profit.”
“There are examples of positive
experiences in foreign investment. These include Bema Gold, Julietta,
Kinross/Omolon/Kubaka, starting with Cyprus Amax,
High River Gold in Buryatzoloto and Pokrovskoye. But the
balance sheet is slanted towards the negative experiences.”
“When foreign companies ask me if they should invest
in Russia, I say yes. It
is relatively cheap and available. Our
political environment is no worse that Asia
or South America. The total tax
burden for Kubaka or Omolon is 22%, or the average cost is $140/oz.”
Please note that nuances in facts or data
may have been altered in the translation and transcribing process.